The appointment of John Galliano at Dior required him to innovate and create at an extraordinary pace—at times producing up to 32 collections a year. Similarly, other creatives in the past were placed under comparable pressures. Alexander McQueen simultaneously served as the creative director of both Givenchy and his own house; Tom Ford steered both Gucci and Saint Laurent; Marc Jacobs for his own label and Louis Vuitton; and perhaps most strikingly, Karl Lagerfeld oversaw Patou, his own label, Chanel, and Fendi, often all at the same time.

​

Viewed through the lens of the “everyday” brain, such demands might appear entirely unreasonable. However, what existing research has largely failed to illuminate is that these individuals often exhibit personality characteristics that align with what can be described as a uniquely gifted, atypical cognitive profile—one that operates in fundamentally different ways. Their minds must be understood through this more nuanced lens, one that challenges traditional frameworks of human behaviour and transcends the conventional operational, psychological, and structural assumptions about how the human mind functions.

​

However, this lens has rarely been articulated, researched, or even meaningfully attempted—largely because it resists conventional methods of analysis. The gifted individual functions as a complex and fluid cognitive system, one that does not follow linear developmental patterns and frequently defies standard psychological frameworks. A gifted mind can shift between modes of being with remarkable elasticity: operating with the maturity of a 20-year-old one moment, the playful spontaneity of a five-year-old the next, and the analytical precision of a scientist shortly after. This multidimensional way of thinking challenges traditional notions of what is considered “professional” or “unprofessional,” because such labels rely on linear behavioural expectations that simply do not apply to these minds. In other words, the creative individual’s value cannot be assessed—or limited—by conventional behavioural metrics, as their brilliance lies precisely in their dynamic, non-conforming cognitive movement.

​

Within the field of creativity, the notion that one should “create like a child and edit like a scientist” (Tyler The Creator) has been widely circulated across platforms. This simplified phrase offers perhaps the most accessible glimpse into the cognitive elasticity of gifted individuals; those whose minds move fluidly between playfulness, intuition, and analytical precision. It is a distilled expression of the very lens through which their behaviour must be understood.

​

So how, then, should talent be identified and acquired within the fashion industry? When we consider the learning difficulties faced by some of the most influential designers of the past, their struggles with traditional education, their inability to concentrate on a single task for extended periods, it becomes evident that many of them would possibly not have succeeded under today’s entry requirements. The industry’s increasing insistence on formal academic credentials, which are now often accessible only through significant financial means, risks excluding precisely the kinds of minds that have historically shaped fashion’s most groundbreaking movements. Comparing the unconventional cognitive profiles of past visionaries with the rigid pathways required today reveals a fundamental mismatch: the industry continues to demand brilliance, yet it increasingly filters talent through structures that the gifted mind was never designed to navigate.

​

If the talent of such individuals is often hidden, or expressed in ways that are not immediately observable, how can the fashion industry truly identify and acquire it? Should other personality characteristics, such as adaptability, resilience, or the ability to navigate complex social dynamics, play a role in determining who is allowed to contribute meaningfully to the industry? More importantly, how can these gatekeeping mechanisms be designed to recognize the unique cognitive profiles that drive innovation, rather than filtering out the very minds capable of shaping the next chapter of fashion in the century ahead?

 

The key characteristics which were identified in my research were 9 categories which build The Neurocognitive Blueprint of the Designer, further positioned the designers within traits commonly associated with giftedness; and operated as the base for understanding the Creative brain. Across this dataset, which was observed within the biographical accounts of Dior, Galliano, McQueen, Lagerfeld and Saint Laurent nine subthemes were identified: (1) Hyperfocus, (2) Restlessness, (3) Learning Information, (4) Innovative Thinking, (5) Problem Solving, (6) Boredom with Repetitiveness, (7) Preference for Solitude, (8) Sensory Sensitivity, and (9) Imaginative Thinking. 

​

            While all nine traits contribute to the Neurocognitive Blueprint of the Designer, this article will focus primarily on two: hyperfocus and restlessness. These traits not only exemplify the extraordinary cognitive abilities of gifted designers but also highlight behaviors that are often misunderstood by both the industry and the media. By examining these characteristics in detail, we can better understand how gifted minds operate under the unique pressures of high-fashion design, and why conventional measures of professionalism fail to capture their creative potential.

 

1. HYPERFOCUS.

The phenomenon of “hyperfocus” refers to a person’s ability to become completely absorbed in a particular task, to the extent that they tune out their surroundings . Often observed in individuals with attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), this state is characterized by such intense engagement in a task that the individual becomes almost unaware of their surroundings and the passage of time. Individuals who chronically struggle with distraction may also find themselves unable to disengage from a specific task, particularly ones they are highly interested in. However, gifted individuals are often misdiagnosed with ADHD, as the two groups share many overlapping qualities and characteristics. This notion is supported by Silverman (1998) who identifies both “hyperactivity” and “hyperfocus” of the mind as traits commonly observed in the gifted (Silverman, 1998). 

​

Such moments align closely with Csikszentmihalyi’s (1996) theory of flow; a heightened state of consciousness marked by deep engagement, time distortion, and a freedom from self- consciousness, particularly seen in creatives. Within flow, distractions are excluded from consciousness, and the concentration of one is highly focused on the task one does in the present. 

This is evident in these passages from the designer’s biographies: 

​

“[Yves was] sketching ... burning himself up from the inside, spinning with ideas... when he was finished.... he suffered a nervous breakdown... The sketches...there were thousands of them all over the floor....it was superhuman.” (Drake, 2007, p. 208) 

 

“Karl went sketching more and more collection. Faster and faster... until by the end Karl had drawn fifty collections.” (Drake, 2007, p. 170) 

 

“Suddenly one such flash of inspirations gives me an electric shock. I am possessed and embroidered endless variations on this one theme...Little by little the pile of drawings grows.... finally, this crazy burst of scribbling comes to an end.” (Dior, 2007, p. 65) 

 

 

Within these passages, one can observe the rapid speed of thought as the designer enters a state of hyperfocus on the task of designing. It becomes evident that their surroundings and distractions fade away, allowing their mind to produce numerous variations of sketches quickly and effortlessly.

 

During this “Hyperfocus” episode, the designer reaches a state of subconscious flow, where the mind operates like a creative machine, accelerating until it exhausts its ideas. This mental exhaustion is reflected in the accounts of Saint Laurent who reached a nervous breakdown of emptiness. 

​

Now, this is particularly evident in the ability of these designers to produce up to 40 collections per year. The state of hyperfocus allows their minds to operate at extraordinary speed and intensity, generating ideas and sketches with a level of productivity that would seem impossible under normal cognitive conditions. In this heightened state, designers can rapidly explore countless variations of a concept, seamlessly moving from one idea to the next, often losing awareness of time and surroundings. Hyperfocus not only amplifies creative output but also enables the sustained innovation required to meet the relentless demands of the fashion industry at such a prolific pace.

​

The state of hyperfocus is particularly evident in Daniel Roseberry’s sketching process for Schiaparelli, as seen in numerous videos documenting his work. In these moments, Roseberry appears almost as a vessel through which ideas flow directly from mind to hand, translating abstract thoughts into tangible designs with remarkable speed and precision. His attention is entirely absorbed in the act of creation; the surrounding world fades away, leaving only the immediate task of bringing his vision to life. This seamless transfer of cognitive energy into physical expression exemplifies the kind of deep engagement described by Csikszentmihalyi’s concept of flow, in which time becomes distorted and consciousness is wholly directed toward the present creative act.

​

In observing Roseberry’s process, it becomes clear that hyperfocus allows not only for rapid idea generation but also for the simultaneous exploration of multiple variations of a single concept. Within a single session, he can iterate countless sketches, experimenting with proportions, textures, and details without hesitation. The mind operates like a highly efficient creative engine, producing a volume and depth of work that would be unimaginable under standard cognitive conditions. This capacity to sustain such intense focus and output demonstrates the cognitive flexibility and intensity characteristic of gifted designers.

​

This phenomenon is also particularly evident in historical accounts of Alexander McQueen, who was known to design entire collections in the final hours before deadlines. Biographical evidence suggests that he often worked late into the night, producing hundreds of sketches in a single sitting, driven by intense bursts of creative energy. Like Roseberry, McQueen entered a state in which his mind operated almost independently, generating ideas at extraordinary speed while his hand translated them onto paper. These episodes highlight the capacity of gifted designers to harness hyperfocus under pressure, turning constraints and deadlines into catalysts for creativity rather than limitations.

 

 

2. RESTLESSNESS​.

Hyperfocus and restlessness are closely intertwined. While hyperfocus allows a designer to concentrate intensely on a single task, restlessness drives them to continuously seek new challenges and mental stimulation. Together, these traits explain the seemingly paradoxical behaviors observed in gifted designers: the ability to immerse fully in one project while simultaneously resisting stagnation and conventional limits on creativity.

 

Most individuals naturally gravitate toward entropy, which is defined as the tendency to seek low-energy, relaxed states. however, creative individuals often prefer continuous mental stimulation through problem solving. This is particularly evident within the fashion designer’s experiences which find struggle in relaxing particularly lacking sleep: 

 

“Once I am home, I find myself thinking about the debatable toile in the middle of the night- those collection-haunted nights which turn the days into a single feverish sarabande.” (Dior, 2007, p. 79) 

 

“The sleepless nights the frayed nerves that’s what I thrive on, the constant search for perfection...” (Galliano in Thomas, 2015, pp. 92-93) 

 

“[Karl] dreamt up collections and he would often wake up to sketch in the middle of the night....” (Claudia Schiffer in Kalvelytė, n.d.). 

 

Early psychological accounts suggest that restlessness is linked to the part of the mind that holds ideas just below the level of conscious awareness. This “preconscious” store of information can become highly active, keeping thoughts ready to emerge when needed. As a result, the mind can operate in a state where creativity and problem-solving are constantly primed, even when the individual is not actively focused on a task. This underlying mental activity can explain why some highly creative individuals appear restless or find it difficult to switch off, yet it also fuels their ability to generate innovative ideas rapidly and adaptively.

​

The preconscious mind can be thought of as the part of the brain that operates automatically, guiding thought, memory, and action without deliberate effort. It is responsible for procedural processes—skills and knowledge that we perform without consciously thinking about them, like movement, pattern recognition, or symbolic thinking. In highly creative individuals, this system appears to remain more active for longer periods, allowing them to process ideas and generate insights even when not consciously focused on a task.

​

This heightened preconscious activity helps explain the restlessness often observed in gifted designers. They may alternate between behaviours of vastly different developmental stages, shifting from playful, instinctual thinking to highly analytical and precise work. In practice, this manifests as the ability to enter a state of deep, almost hypnotic concentration, where creativity flows effortlessly. Designers in this state—similar to hyperfocus—can produce extraordinary output, often working late into the night, seemingly fuelled by the act of creation itself rather than the need for rest.

​

Restlessness, reduced sleep, and continuous mental engagement are therefore not signs of inefficiency or distraction; they are hallmarks of a creative, highly gifted mind. These individuals derive energy and pleasure from active thinking and imagining, often operating in a “preconscious flow” where ideas emerge instinctively. This capacity underpins the extraordinary productivity of designers like McQueen and Roseberry, allowing them to generate complex, innovative work under conditions that would challenge the average creative mind.

 

These are only two of the nine characteristics identified in the Neurocognitive Blueprint of the Designer, yet they illustrate why the behaviours of gifted individuals are often misinterpreted as unprofessional, erratic, or incapable of following linear processes. The purpose of presenting this framework is clear: the extraordinary creative capacity of these individuals should neither be doubted nor reduced to conventional standards of productivity or professionalism. Their minds operate according to principles that defy linear logic, rigid schedules, and standardized expectations, and this difference is not a flaw—it is the source of their innovation.

​

Unfortunately, this nuance is often overlooked in media coverage. Designers such as Demna Gvasalia and Jonathan Anderson have frequently been scrutinized for their unconventional working methods, with narratives emphasizing doubt over their ability to meet the demands of iconic fashion houses like Gucci and Dior. Headlines and commentary have framed their processes as reckless, overambitious, or inefficient—failing to recognize that these behaviors are not flaws, but expressions of cognitive patterns that enable extraordinary creativity and output.

​

This misrepresentation does more than mischaracterize individual designers; it reflects a broader misunderstanding of how innovation occurs. The media and industry stakeholders often expect work to conform to linear timelines, predictable workflows, and standardized measures of productivity. Yet gifted creatives operate differently: their minds are non-linear, oscillating between periods of intense focus, restlessness, and imaginative exploration. Judging them by conventional standards risks undervaluing the very traits that allow them to generate groundbreaking ideas and reshape the landscape of fashion.

​

To foster innovation at the level of Dior, Saint Laurent, or McQueen, the fashion industry must shift its approach. Rather than trying to force gifted individuals into rigid schedules, leaders should recognize and accommodate the unique rhythms of their creative processes. This means allowing space for bursts of inspiration, supporting iterative experimentation, and valuing mental engagement and exploration as much as tangible output. By aligning organizational practices with the cognitive realities of creative minds, fashion houses can cultivate environments where visionary work is not only possible but inevitable.

​

Ultimately, the lesson is that the extraordinary abilities of gifted designers cannot be measured through conventional metrics alone. It is the interplay of hyperfocus, restlessness, and other cognitive traits that fuels their capacity to redefine fashion and culture. Understanding, nurturing, and respecting these patterns is essential—not only to preserve the legacies of these innovators but to ensure the industry continues to evolve, producing the visionary work that challenges norms and inspires generations.